District 96 law firm probing Lamberson pay

Internal probe has revealed "troublesome irregularities," says board president

Updated:

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Bob Skolnik

Contributing Reporter

The Riverside School District 96 Board of Education hired a new law firm on Wednesday — one that is investigating "troublesome irregularities" regarding compensation the district paid to former Superintendent Jonathan Lamberson.

After meeting in closed session for two hours, a closely divided Riverside Elementary School District 96 Board of Education voted 4 to 3 at 1 a.m. on April 2 to hire the law firm of Franczek Radelet as the school district's attorney and to dismiss the firm Hodges, Loizzi, Eisenhammer, Rodick & Kohn, which was hired by the school board just 11 months ago.

President Mary Rose Mangia joined with board members Randy Brockway, Rachel Marrello and Michael O'Brien to vote to replace the district's law firm. 

"I felt they did not do a good job of representing the interests of the school board in particular," said O'Brien of why he voted to replace Hodges Loizzi. "[There were] a couple of requests that Mary Rose [Mangia] had made on behalf of the board, and I don't think Hodges and Loizzi followed up or did a good job responding to our requests and concerns, and I felt it was time for a change." 

One of those requests is believed to have to do with the pay of former Superintendent Jonathan Lamberson. For the past few months the board and the District 96 administration has been trying to find out why the district had to pay slightly more than $200,000 in additional contributions, to the Illinois Teacher Retirement System when Lamberson retired last year. 

Of the total amount, $77,087.17 was a penalty, because Lamberson apparently received pay increases, as TRS calculated them, in excess of 6 percent annually during his final contract, even though his contract called for him to receive 4-percent annual raises.

"We have uncovered troublesome irregularities, and we have turned them over for investigation," Mangia told the Landmark.

At its March 19 meeting, the school board voted unanimously to hire Franczek Radelet to look into TRS and contract issues involving Lamberson. An early version of the agenda for the March 19 meeting that was posted on the district's website had Lamberson's name next to the agenda item involving TRS and contract items. 

That version of the agenda was taken down and replaced with an agenda that did not mention Lamberson. At the March 19 meeting, Franczek Radelet partner Shelli Anderson met with the school board in closed session.

Brockway confirmed that one reason he voted to hire Franczek Radelet to handle all of the district's legal matters was that he was not happy with how Hodges Loizzi responded to questions about Lamberson.

"They failed us recently with this Lamberson thing," said Brockway, who added that Hodges Loizzi didn't submit to a full response to questions the board raised about Lamberson's pay until after Franczek Radelet was hired.

"It wasn't until we hired Franczek that we got an email from [attorney Stanley] Eisenhammer," Brockway said. "It wasn't satisfactory. It didn't go into the detail that we wanted. It alludes to the fact that there were some overpayments and the penalties likely resulted from that."

The Landmark has learned from two sources that on March 31 the board sent a letter to Lamberson, who is now superintendent of the Cedarburg, Wis., school district, apparently containing questions about Lamberson's pay.

"We found some errors that [Lamberson] has to explain," said Brockway. "We'll see if he has an explanation. We wouldn't have pursued this if we didn't think there was some wrongdoing."

Lamberson did not respond to a phone call or an email message asking him for comment.

Franczek Radelet has represented Riverside-Brookfield High School District 208 since 2006. Late Tuesday night, right before the board vote, five Franczek Radelet attorneys met with the District 96 school board.

Franczek Radelet is now the third law firm to represent District 96 in the last 12 months. Hodges Loizzi was brought in last May to replace the firm of Scariano, Himes and Petrarca. All three firms are large, respected firms that represent many school districts in the Chicago area.

During its time working for District 96, Hodges Loizzi negotiated the resignations of former Ames School Principal Colleen Lieggi, former Hauser Principal Leslie Berman and former Special Education Director Mary Polk, and also negotiated separation agreements with former Technology Director Vern Bettis and Blythe Park School Principal Bob Chleboun.

Mangia said the majority of the board just had a greater comfort level with Franczek Radelet than it had with Hodges Loizzi, which was hired last year before Mangia, Brockway and Marrello came on the school board. 

"We just wanted our own," Mangia said. "This was something the old board gave us. We worked with them for a year. … We did not want to work with the one the last board bequeathed to us."

Lisa Gaynor, David Kodama and Art Perry voted to keep Hodges Loizzi.

"I'm sure Franczek Radelet will do a fine job," Perry said. "Their credentials are solid gold and they're very well-known, just like Hodges, Loizzi, Eisenhammer, Rodick & Kohn."

But, Perry said, the school board didn't follow its own policy in making a change in law firms at this time.

"We have a process in place, per policy, to review our professional services like legal counsel and other things every other year, and I didn't feel like this process was followed in this particular case."

Reader Comments

4 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Peter Schueler from Riverside, Illinois  

Posted: April 11th, 2014 12:12 PM

(Cont'd) I would add that the board and administration should come together and get on deck with a solid choice for the Technology opening - after the current superintendent and director of academic excellence clearly expound on their own joint philosophy and the educated charting of our current and future use of technology in this district. See the D96 "Guiding Principle: Academic and Professional ?" Expectation 3" i.e., "Develop district-wide instructional technology guidelines to optimize rigorous and relevant learning experiences." These are not even established ?" shouldn't they be first? And shouldn't our professional leadership be front and center on this? I have not heard anything substantive in this regard ?" in the absence of a necessary destination how can this district 'arrive'?

Peter Schueler from Riverside, Illinois  

Posted: April 11th, 2014 12:09 PM

The time was overdue to investigate these irregularities and responsible parties on behalf of D96. Ridding D96 of the previous legal representation was the correct step on behalf of the BOE membership specific to the 'pro-change' voting member majority of Mangia, Marello, Brockway, and O'Brien. In light of the fact that there was a lack of communication (at least) regarding this issue on the part of the previous firm why would Perry, Gaynor and Kodama hide behind a 'policy in place' to rationalize their continued support of a substandard relationship with the very legal representation that is supposed to support the BOE? Keep the poor communication and stalling going on for another full year? The 'narrative' of the previous board and administration may get old, but it is important enough to hold up to scrutiny and correct what took place in realigning D96 back on course. This is why the new board members (Mangia, Marello, Brockway) were voted in, (a minority of 3), and they are working hard against the 'stay the old course' mentality of Kodama, Gaynor, and Perry. Thank You to Mr. O'Brien for supporting this change and breaking this trio's voting block. In spite of best intentions, our previous Boards of Education during the Lamberson era been part and parcel to a critical lack of oversight resulting in part to a damaged district. I say THANK YOU to the 4 Pro Change voters on the board for holding on to the wheel and charting the steerage of D96 through better waters of integrity and transparency. I would add that the board and administration should come together and get on deck with a solid choice for the Technology opening - after the current superintendent and director of academic excellence clearly expound on their own joint philosophy and the educated charting of our current and future use of technology in this district. See the D96 "Guiding Principle: Academic and Professional ?" Expectation 3" i.e., "Develop district-wide instru

Joanne Rogers from Riverside, Illinois  

Posted: April 4th, 2014 7:15 PM

If there are financial irregularities, they should absolutely be investigated. If the law firm the board has hired isn't responding appropriately, they should absolutely be replaced. I applaud the board for taking on the tough issues facing the district. I think that's awesome.

Cristin Monti Evans from Riverside, Illinois  

Posted: April 3rd, 2014 8:45 PM

You know what would be awesome? If the D96 BOE would focus on one thing and finally get something accomplished. Now that we have our second law firm in less than a year lined up, do you think we could maybe hire a technology director? And Mary Rose, please, take a look around, your board is comprised of more than half of "the old board," and they were voted in just as you were. That narrative is so tired. You are so much better than that.

Hire Local for FREE!

Post help wanted ads for FREE on the our local online job board.

Click here to place your ad

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Riverside and Brookfield.


            
SubscribeClassified
Photo storeContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad

Latest Comments