Brookfield rebuffed again by judge in RBHS case

Judge irked by village's second attempt to get lawsuit dismissed

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Bob Skolnik

Contributing Reporter

The village of Brookfield struck out again in court again Tuesday morning as it tried for a second time to persuade a Cook County Circuit Court judge to dismiss the lawsuit filed against it by Riverside-Brookfield High School District 208.

Brookfield had tried to have the lawsuit dismissed in September, but Judge Mary Mikva rejected the village's arguments, although she did order the high school to amend one portion of its complaint.

But, Mikva was perturbed that the village tried the same tactic twice to get her to dismiss the case. She swiftly denied the village's motion to dismiss the case on Tuesday.

"I'm pretty unhappy with you guys," she told attorney Michael R. Durkin, who was representing the village. Village Attorney Richard Ramello was not in court for Tuesday morning's hearing.

"Get word back to whoever did this, and don't do it again," Mikva told Durkin.

Last summer, District 208 filed a lawsuit claiming that the April decision of the Brookfield Village Board to deny the high school zoning variances and a special use permit to build a new parking lot and tennis courts on a field just north of Hollywood School was arbitrary and capricious.

Ramello, reached at his office Tuesday afternoon, said the village's motion was filed in good faith. He said that Mikva had instructed the village to clarify its position and that the new motion was the village's attempt to do that.

"We made it clear to her that's she just supposed to consider the findings and recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the proposed findings of the Board of Trustees," Ramello said. "We cited those cases; made it eminently clear that's not that's not what she's supposed to do. The issue is not whether the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of Trustees' decision was correct or incorrect, it's whether or not the school district was denied substantive due process."

Ramello said that he could not appeal the judge's ruling until the case is over.

Following Tuesday's hearing, the village had 21 days to file a substantive answer to the complaint. Then the case will move to the discovery phase. The next court date is set for Jan. 12.

The attorney representing RBHS says the school district would like to enter into settlement talks with the village and resolve the case before going to trial. But the village apparently isn't interested.

"We opened up the possibility of sitting down with the court for a settlement conference and that was pretty much rejected," said Nicki Bazer, the attorney representing RBHS.

Reader Comments

4 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Irina Hynes from Brookfield  

Posted: December 11th, 2015 10:32 PM

So Ramello was not in court, but he feels like telling the judge what she is or is not supposed to do? Real impressive lawyering.

Rebekah Pierce  

Posted: November 20th, 2015 8:11 AM

As residents of Brookfield in RBHS school district, we are paying for both sides of this idiotic fight. When does the insanity end? Our property taxes are astronomical as is! How much more?

Michael Towner  

Posted: November 19th, 2015 4:57 PM

Of course this way the residents keep shoveling money to the village attorney, maybe this will help Garvey get a job with them.

Michael Towner from Brookfield  

Posted: November 19th, 2015 4:54 PM

Another failure in leadership by Ketchmark, Garvey and PEP. A real leader would take the School district up on an over to negotiate a reasonable solution for everyone. This is how Garvey works they screw up then hide. Did the same with the Zoo and Cook county. When will the voters see this?

Facebook Connect

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Riverside and Brookfield.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad