Here we go again

Opinion: Editorials

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By Editorial

The Landmark View

According to North Riverside Mayor Hubert Hermanek Jr., the village of North Riverside won't be paying a dime for an appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court of a lower-court ruling concerning the village's firefighting privatization efforts.

Earlier this month, the village's law firm, Odelson and Sterk, filed a petition for leave to appeal, asking the Supreme Court to overturn a ruling by the state appellate court, which affirmed the proper venue to resolve the village's dispute with its union firefighters is before an Illinois Labor Relations Board arbitrator.

Hermanek told the Landmark that he didn't ask the law firm to file the petition, but that the law firm insisted on the filing as a matter of the firm's policy.

When the appellate court ruling came down a couple of months ago, Hermanek said he was through litigating the matter. And for good reason – the village had its arguments dismissed at every step since the court battle started in September 2014.

Attorneys for the village argued – they continue to argue – that universally accepted labor law regarding no-strike, no-lockout protections in contracts for essential emergency personnel somehow have been misinterpreted for the last three-plus decades.

That the law firm felt its policy should trump the mayor's wishes to stop litigating the matter is remarkable. The firm has been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars since the beginning of the 2014 legal action, not only to pursue the lawsuit itself, but to respond and defend fallout from that action, including unfair labor practice complaints.

And, at every turn, the village attorney's theories for why the village ought to be able to unilaterally terminate the union contract and substitute union firefighters with non-union personnel has been rejected.

We would have preferred the mayor telling the law firm the village employs to take a hike on the leave to appeal. And the village better not pay another dime on a lawsuit that was a pipedream to begin with.

Both the union and village administration is better served by concentrating on the labor arbitration process that has already started and work with the arbitrator to finally get this deal done.

The goal here should be first-rate public safety services, provided by the public body, for a cost that can be acceptably borne by the public.

It's the public that matters here. Public servants ought to keep that in mind. 

Reader Comments

3 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Malone Vince  

Posted: November 22nd, 2017 5:16 AM

Lol. More money for the Law firm. The only winner in this battle. This matter is getting very old. All NR Residents. Hope you all remember this when voting for a NEW MAYOR, AND HIS COUNCIL OF CLOWNS. WHO'S PAYING THE BILL?? Herb your times about up. This town is just getting worse and worse!!! Deny It? Anyone? Almost a Million dollars spent fighting OUR FIREMAN, PLUS 56 MILLION DOLLARS IN DEBT LEFT BY OUR FORMER MAYOR? MAYBE WE SHOULD ASK HIM WHERE ALL THE MONEY WENT!!? SEEING HIS DEPARTURE WAS PERFECT TIMING. AND THE GUYS STILL MAKING VILLAGE DECISIONS. HERB, YOUR JUST A PUPPET . POLITICAL PUPPET. WHY DOES NO-ONE ASK THESE QUEDTIONS. I WILL BE SOON ENOUGH. LMFAO , YOU FOOLS .

David Rajk  

Posted: November 16th, 2017 6:45 PM

Wow the law firm of Odelson and Sterk's policy can trump the mayor's wishes. I don't think anyone really believes that. How generous of Olelson and Stern to do this for free. I don't think anyone really believes that either. Oh well, just my opinion.

Toni Parker  

Posted: November 14th, 2017 10:33 PM

Can't help but wonder if this is something - if what the Mayor is stating is true - that the ARDC should be taking a looksee at?

Facebook Connect

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Riverside and Brookfield.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad