District 96 board says it can't answer questions

Parents remain frustrated by lack of response in Lieggi case

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By Bob Skolnik

Contributing Reporter

For the second month in a row on Dec. 18 there was a standing room-only crowd at a meeting of the Riverside Elementary School District 96 Board of Education. And, many were there to ask questions and comment about the circumstances surrounding the sudden removal of a part-time teacher at Ames School last year and the actions of Ames School Principal Colleen Lieggi.

But, as in the past, there were more questions from those at the meeting than answers from the school board.

"At public comment we don't answer questions," said school board President Mary Ellen Meindl in response to a question about whether district policies were followed about reporting allegations of child abuse.

The teacher ultimately resigned a year ago after the district first tried to fire her. The teacher was suspended without pay in September 2011, two weeks after Lieggi had gone to Riverside police to report that her daughter had been abused by the teacher when the teacher had been babysitting for Lieggi.

A police investigation cleared the teacher and found no evidence of any abuse. After first moving to fire the teacher for alleged violations of policy, the district eventually agreed to pay the teacher for the remainder of the school year if she resigned and agreed not to sue the district.

Lieggi also reported to police that her children told her that they had been abused by a Riverside family and her ex-husband, but police also cleared the family and the ex-husband.

At the Dec. 18 school board meeting, parents focused on whether the district followed district policy in reporting allegations of child abuse.

Meindl said that the board could not discuss specifics because they involved personnel issues.

"We are governed by our policies and legally we cannot talk about personnel issues with the public because every individual deserves privacy," Meindl said.

Many were not satisfied with that response.

"I'm very disappointed in the board in that I don't see any transparency," said Pearl Gaskins, the mother of an Ames School fourth-grader. "I'm very concerned about the safety of my child. I don't feel like that you are equally concerned with that."

Meindl told Gaskins that she should send the board an email if she had a specific question or concern and that the board would respond with what information it could.

When the public comment period was completed, Meindl read a prepared statement acknowledging the frustration that the school board's reticence has caused.

She said that the board's separation agreement with the teacher limited what it could say about the situation. The agreement states that if a third party inquiries into the teacher's employment, the district would reply with her last rate of pay, that she resigned to pursue other opportunities and that it is the district's policy to provide no other information regarding a district employee.

"We recognize it can be frustrating for members of the public to ask specific questions and not receive specific answers," said Meindl. "The safety of children in our schools is our highest priority. We have investigated, and continue to investigate, the actions of all employees involved in this matter to determine that district policy was executed correctly."

Meindl also stated that the school board's policy committee in November began reviewing policies to make sure what happened last year does not happen again.

Prior to Meindl's statement a few others expressed their exasperation with the lack of answers from the school board.

"This is my 12th year as a parent in this district, and it's been shoddy treatment from year one to year 12," said Mary Jo Robling. "This board has for years, and even the people who predate you, deflect, deflect, deflect. You don't respect the parents in this community."

But not everyone was critical. Karen McGee acknowledged that being a school board member was a difficult job.

"I would never be able to do it," McGee said. "It's a tough job and I thank you guys for sticking it out."

Love the Landmark?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Riverside Brookfield Landmark and RBLandmark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

7 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

to glad  

Posted: December 28th, 2012 8:11 PM

What are you talking about? Who three? We three? Do you mean the three who has an opinion about our community BOE? If it is "us three" then I can only speak for myself, no I dont plan on running for the BOE. Yesterday I complained about bad pork chop i was served at a local eatery, so should I have gone back and cooked it myself? I think not..... We elect the Boe to make safe decisions for our students i have every right/reason to question their actions or lack of...

Joanne Rogers  

Posted: December 27th, 2012 3:43 PM

There are a total of six people running for four slots: three incumbents, Meindl, Gaynor and Leimberer, and three reform candidates: Rachel Marrello, Mary Rose Mangia, and Randy Brockway.

Glad  

Posted: December 27th, 2012 3:23 PM

Maybe it was you three, but the paper still hasn't announced it yet.

Glad  

Posted: December 27th, 2012 1:36 PM

I'm surprised the paper hasn't announced the three of you who commented about the quality of the school board has yet to announce that you are running to replace the current school board. The filing deadline was yesterday. I wonder what the hold up is.

Of course they do.  

Posted: December 27th, 2012 9:29 AM

Lieggi et al allowed Ms. Batters by to stay because Colleen knew it was a falsehood. I was at the meeting. Has there ever been a more incompetent school board? None of it happened on school grounds. Why is it a school issue? It's criminal.

sad from north riverside  

Posted: December 26th, 2012 8:14 PM

This is very sad. When you think about the people hurt by lieggi's actions and she is allowed to continue as principal. Someone who allows a teacher accused of abusing children to remain in the classroom for 2 weeks and the board continues to protect her. Why do they refuse to something about this? I'm speechless! The board, lamberson and lieggi have lost all credibility with me-agian they are sad.

question and answer  

Posted: December 26th, 2012 10:02 AM

I'd like to see the settlement agreement that they claim prevents them from answering questions. I'm sure they can't make statements about the teacher; there is probably nothing preventing them from commenting on Lieggi and failure to follow policy. A cowardly act from a cowardly board.

Facebook Connect

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Riverside and Brookfield.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad