Illinois House passes partial red-light camera ban

Bill would outlaw devices in non-home rule communities

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By JERRY NOWICKI

Capitol News Illinois

SPRINGFIELD – The Illinois House advanced a partial ban of red-light cameras in the state on Feb. 26 with strong bipartisan support, but some said the bill was a "piecemeal" approach because it does not apply in several communities.

House Bill 322, sponsored by Barrington Hills Republican Rep. David McSweeney, would prohibit non-home rule units of government from enacting or enforcing red light camera ordinances starting Jan. 1, 2021.

Home rule is a status that state law confers to any municipality with more than 25,000 residents or other municipalities that choose to adopt it by referendum. Those municipalities have greater authority to control their own local affairs.

According to the Illinois Municipal League, 217 of Illinois' 1,298 incorporated municipalities have home rule powers.

Per state law, however, red-light cameras are currently only allowed in municipalities within Cook, DuPage, Kane, Lake, Madison, McHenry, St. Clair and Will counties, so opponents of the bill said only 20 municipalities that currently have red light cameras would be affected.

Non-home rule communities that have red-light cameras in operation include North Riverside, River Forest and Westchester.

McSweeney's bill advanced amid growing opposition to the red-light camera industry as Safespeed LLC, one of the state's main companies that supply the machines, has been the subject of ongoing federal investigative activity.

North Riverside, Berwyn and River Forest all have red-light cameras operated by SafeSpeed.

McSweeney said the measure was similar to one he passed in the House in 2015. He alleged that bill was killed in the Senate at the time by now former-Sen. Martin Sandoval, a Chicago Democrat who recently pleaded guilty to bribery and tax fraud charges and admitted in court that he viewed himself as a "protector" of red-light cameras.

McSweeney said his bill was about fighting corruption and a program that targets low-income Illinoisans.

"I am fighting hard to end the corrupt Illinois red-light camera program," McSweeney said in a statement. "These cameras are not about safety. They are all about producing revenue and lining the pockets of political insiders. It is wrong; it is corrupt and it must stop."

Like the 84-4 vote to advance the bill on the House floor, criticism of red-light cameras has been largely bipartisan in recent weeks.

State Comptroller Susana Mendoza, a Democrat, echoed that sentiment in January when she announced the state would no longer assist municipalities in collecting red light camera fines.

Among those voting in favor of the bill were state representatives LaShawn Ford (D-8th), Edgar Gonzalez Jr. (D-21st) and Elizabeth Hernandez (D-24th). All three represent part of the Landmark's coverage area.

State Rep. Michael Zalewski (D-23rd), of Riverside, voted present.

But, much of the floor discussion on Feb. 26 centered on why McSweeney's bill exempted home-rule municipalities.

"My question, ultimately, is why not wait and run a bill that actually bans them in their entirety, because what this does is a piecemeal approach," Rep. Grant Wehrli, a Naperville Republican said in floor debate, adding that it could be misinterpreted as a complete ban by news consumers.

McSweeney said he would be ready to support a complete ban if the bill got as far as a floor vote, but no such measure has done so.

Rep. Diane Pappas (D-Itasca) argued the bill takes aim not at red-light cameras but smaller communities that are already restricted on what safety measures and revenue streams they can put in place.

"What we're doing by passing this bill is not banning evil red-light cameras, we are depriving non-home rule communities of rights that home rule communities will continue to have," she said.

Rep. Anthony DeLuca (D-Chicago Heights) suggested that taking away red-light ticket revenue might cause affected municipalities to raise property taxes, but McSweeney said those communities should cut costs.

DeLuca said the red-light camera program should be reformed rather than partially banned.

"I believe you're doing this bill to create a headline, you're not doing this bill to solve corruption," Rep. Thaddeus Jones (D-Calumet City) said.

Rep. Rita Mayfield (D-Waukegan), however, strongly supported the measure, saying red-light cameras "have been a crux in the black and brown communities for years."

"Red-light cameras have not helped anyone in the communities," she said.

While only four representatives voted against the measure, five voted present and 17 did not vote on the matter. It will head to the Senate for debate in committee before it can come to a vote in the full chamber.

This story has been changed to clarify how many communities would be affected by the legislation should it become law.

Love the Landmark?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Riverside Brookfield Landmark and RBLandmark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

3 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

John Chauvet from north riverside  

Posted: February 28th, 2020 9:02 AM

The big complaint is that the cameras target black and brown... The cities I see listed as losing cameras are North RIverside, Berwyn, Forest Park, River Forest and Westchester.. Did I miss a huge demographics change????

Ed Sel  

Posted: February 27th, 2020 6:07 PM

Just a bunch of lawyered-up deception designed mainly for the drive-by media in Chicago to trumpet around as reform. This ban exempts most of the biggest looting cities and towns and also leaves the door wide-open for non home-rule communities to become home-rule as the ban won't kick-in until 2021. Typical Illinois scammers in both parties. Ban the cameras completely and stop the transparent grandstanding. What a bunch of crooks.

Joel Barney  

Posted: February 27th, 2020 2:26 PM

Anthony DeLuca has accepted a $1,000 contribution from RedSpeed LLC. Rather difficult for him to take a position against. https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/campaign-finance/73239/anthony-deluca

Facebook Connect

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Riverside and Brookfield.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad