Riverside board wants more info on development

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter


Tuesday night, the Riverside Village Board applied the brakes to a proposal to construct a four-story, mixed-use development at the corner of Longcommon Road and Burlington Street, opting to table the matter for at least two weeks.

Village President Harold J. Wiaduck instructed the property owners, Harry Liesenfelt and Nick Mlade, and the architect, Robert Kirk, to provide the board with written proof that the project would not be feasible if built differently.

"We keep coming back to the issue of making the case for hardship," Wiaduck said. "I'd like you to address each of the variances and, using the criteria in the ordinance, try to make a case, a compelling case, for each of those."

Kirk reiterated the case for hardship last night, saying that Riverside's unique character and the importance of the site created the need for the development.

"What this site wants is what would be in keeping with the unique historic character of Riverside," Kirk said.

As a result, Kirk said, construction costs for the project will be significantly higher than if the development was built elsewhere. In all, he estimated construction costs at over $7 million.

"It is never our intent to push for something we don't think is reasonable," Kirk said.

Kirk also revealed last night that the 20 condominium units in the development would sell for a minimum of $400,000, although it was clear that the fourth-floor penthouse condos, measuring between 2,800 and 3,200 square feet, would sell for much more than that.

Liesenfelt, the principal owner of the property has remained behind the scenes throughout most of the process. Last night, however, he broke his silence in an attempt to convince trustees the plan was in the village's best interest.

"I consider this to be a superior project," he said. "It's the only project I'd build. I really believe the village needs something to get things going. I believe this is part of it and that it can be the catalyst for this to happen."

Trustee Kevin Smith said that the building as proposed would be in direct conflict with the village's zoning code for the Central Business District and would change the neighborhood.

"Somehow a building of this magnitude is not in keeping with the history of the village, and is antithetical to what's along Burlington," he said. "Something this massive does change the character completely. Why does it have to be such a large building?"

Trustees Cindy Gustafson and Dorothy Schroeder expressed concern that the development does not address the parking needs for a such a development, while trustees John Scully and William Scanlon pointedly had problems with access to the rear of the building and to the property directly north.

"What I do end up becoming uncomfortable with is this alley situation," Scully said. "I'm struggling with an alley that's going under the building."

The Riverside Village Board will convene again for its regular Committee of the Whole meeting on March 7 at 7:30 p.m.

Love the Landmark?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Riverside Brookfield Landmark and RBLandmark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

No Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Facebook Connect