Parkway plants run afoul of Riverside rules

Brightly colored hibiscus flowers on Desplaines Ave. draw complaints

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter

By John Rice

Contributing Reporter

It's been a while since a flower-planting controversy has surfaced in Riverside, but Desplaines Avenue homeowner Ed Buck finds himself in the middle of one.

 Buck planted hibiscus flowers on the public parkway in front of his house at 325 Desplaines Ave. seven years ago and wasn't aware of any problems, until he recently received a letter from Public Works Director Edward Bailey, stating that residents had complained about the plants and they would have to be removed.

On Aug. 13, Buck addressed the village's Landscape Advisory Commission to present his case for keeping the flowers. He's no casual gardener; Buck's lush backyard has been recognized by the Audubon Society and designated a National Wildlife Refuge.

Buck has lived in Riverside for 30 years. He said he was a former city boy, who grew up in a concrete jungle and was drawn to the village for its natural beauty. Buck did his part by building koi ponds in his backyard and surrounding them with foliage and carefully selected trees. 

However, it's his front yard that is seen by the public, and some have objected to what they see.

"It's no accident I live here," Buck told members of the commission on Aug. 13. "I'm an avid lover of trees."

When the village held a cooperative sale of trees, Buck purchased a blue birch. Buck was pleased with his improvements to the property, but he described the parkway as barren. When asked by a committee member why he didn't plant the flowers in his front yard on private property, he said that shade trees would prevent their growth.

He also defended his use of brightly colored hibiscus plants, saying "they're robust, native and beautiful." 

Buck said he enjoys the happiness the flowers bring to his neighbors and people passing by. He said strangers ring his doorbell to ask what the flowers are. Buck said he believes that creating beauty is a good thing and the flowers can be used as a teaching tool for the next generation. 

He would have found a kindred spirit in former village trustee Jerry Buttimer. In 1998, Buttimer experimented by having the Public Works Department plant red, white and blue petunias in planting beds along the downtown sidewalks. He hoped the flowers would enhance the struggling business district. 

"People were joyous about it," Buttimer was quoted at the time in a Chicago Tribune story about what became known as The Petunia Wars. "It put smiles on so many faces."

Buttimer's colleagues on the village board in 1998 were not smiling. They voted to have the flowers dug up. The Landscape Advisory Commission then issued an approved list of a dozen perennials and annuals that could be planted. 

In 2006, the commission published a guide titled "Landscaping in a Landmark Village." It states that, "Any planting in these parkways must be done or approved by the village." 

It further warned against "plantings having vivid colors or of an exotic nature." The guide promotes the planting of native plants. 

Hibiscus flowers are certainly colorful but Buck doesn't see them as harmful to the village's landscaping design. 

"I don't know what the danger is," he said. "They're herbaceous plants." 

Buck cited a portion of the village ordinance that allows grass and herbaceous flowers to be planted on the parkway. 

He also pointed out that other homeowners have planted daylilies and hostas on parkways. He believes the flowers are faithful to Frederick Law Olmsted's vision for the village. 

"Olmsted was a progressive," Buck said. "When he had the money, he planted flowers. I think this is a way to honor the past."

Bailey told the Landmark that he'd gotten five complaints concerning the plantings on the parkway in front of 325 Desplaines Ave. and that the village's ordinances regarding such plantings are clear. 

"I try to be as consistent as I can," Bailey said. "The plants will be allowed to stay until they stop blooming. If the village decides to allow the plants, it will be OK with me." 

Bailey told Buck that he would need an encroachment waiver and a landscape improvement permit. He noted that the vast majority of requests for planting on the parkway are for trees.

"I don't get many applications for the landscaping of a parkway," Bailey said. 

The Landscape Advisory Commission did not recommend a course of action on Aug. 13, seeking more time to look into it. In the meantime, Bailey suggested that Buck write to Village President Ben Sells and Village Manager Jessica Frances about the issue. 

Asked about her views on the subject, Landscape Advisory Commission Chairwoman Cathy Maloney stated in an email that "my personal opinions are irrelevant here."

"We are charged with advising the village board with the best ways to preserve and interpret Olmsted's design principles in the living landscape," Maloney wrote. "Much of our National Historic Landmark designation is dependent on that." 

When asked how the village will handle issues like this in the future, she replied, "Without a change in the ordinance, it would be unreasonable to speculate."

Buck hopes Riverside will approach his plantings with an open mind.

"I don't want to live in a place that's stuck," Buck said, adding that he intends to meet with the Sells and Frances and that he plans to return to the Landscape Advisory Commission when they render their decision.

Love the Landmark?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Riverside Brookfield Landmark and We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

11 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Earl Hickey  

Posted: August 31st, 2019 10:03 PM

What Would Olmsted Have Said About This? "Officer Buzzkill Riverside police responded to Metal Mites, 36 E. Quincy St., after the business' general manager called to report that a 6- to 8-foot-tall marijuana plant was growing along the property's fence line, next to a village parking lot. Police determined that the plant actually was growing on village-owned property and was in among other overgrown plants."

Pam Fontana  

Posted: August 26th, 2019 1:17 PM

Oh my, Derrick. What the heck? There are parkway plantings of flowers right down the street from these and those are okay? Riverside has some of the most ridiculous regulations for some. I guess outdoor drinking (did Olmsted believe that alcohol being served in Riverside and even having a distillery....were part of his plan) establishments were the norm in Olmsted's plan (there are more than one or two in downtown Riverside). All those walls blocking the sidewalks so people can drink outdoors. The horror of it. In case you haven't noticed DesPlaines Avenue does not have the 'slope' to the street that Olmsted wanted (so that the roads were not even visible) or the curve. I guess you have nothing better to do and I bet you are the complainer that got this man's gorgeous plantings in trouble. Boo on you.

Derrick Mancini from Riverside  

Posted: August 23rd, 2019 9:51 AM

They should be removed, then can be planted outside of the parkway in the front of the house, if the owner desires. The Olmsted plan was to have the streets give the look of an English park, with green expanse extending from the roadway and past the sidewalks. Low green herbaceous plants have more recently been allowed since it does not change this effect, but originally it would only have been lawn. While you may like one particular person's plantings, others may not, and once allowed for one, it must be allowed for all. Our Landmark status as a village is also dependent in part on preserving the original Olmsted design. Also, some ornate plants on parkways will limit vision of vehicles coming around curves and corners, and is a driving hazard. These rules have been in place for a long time, and people moving into village should understand they are accepting these rules in so doing. Many of us have moved here because of these aspects of the village, part of what it makes it unique. If you want to live someplace that is different, there are many other places that are wonderful villages not required to hew to Olmsted's design.

David Charles Anthony  

Posted: August 22nd, 2019 10:31 PM

I love the flowers, they brighten my day. Everyone needs to chill. This is the problem with the world, everyone is too uptight. Stop and smell the hibiscus.

Mark Roegner  

Posted: August 22nd, 2019 9:46 PM

Can't do it in Brookfield either its not your property no matter how pretty

Natasha DelAngel  

Posted: August 22nd, 2019 5:16 PM

I love your beautiful hibiscus plants. They bring me such joy everyday that I drive that route from 31st down Des Plaines to 26th. I admire them and they bring a smile to my face when I see them. Because of you, I just bought 2 plants yesterday in hopes to duplicating your rotating color pattern in front of my house. I can't believe after 7 years of them being there that someone has to complain and ruin a good thing. Who would do such a thing? I tell you who miserable, jealous and unhappy people. I am sorry you have to go through this.

Wendy Neal  

Posted: August 22nd, 2019 5:15 PM

I absolutely love seeing them everyday! It would be bureaucratic strong-arming to force their removal. The powers that be need to lighten up!

Susan Wilkens  

Posted: August 22nd, 2019 4:30 PM

"I don't get many applications for the landscaping of a parkway," Bailey said. Jeez ?" I wonder why?? I understand the Village has ordinances & guidelines, but maybe they ought to be revisited.

Ana Guedea  

Posted: August 21st, 2019 8:39 PM

Too bad. I love looking at them. They are cute, colorful and different.

Joanne Schaeffer  

Posted: August 21st, 2019 5:39 PM

I use DesPlaines frequently and always admired the beautiful flowers being talked about here. How sad it is that there is an ordinance regulating flowers yet there is the possibility of a store in Riverside distributing pot. Do you think mindsets are a bit off or is it that crazy has taken over? Just saying........where are priorities? or is it that the flowers don't bring in money and pot does?

Pam Fontana  

Posted: August 21st, 2019 4:46 PM

Every time I drive past this home I love looking at the beautiful flowers. It would be a shame if the village has him remove the plants.

Facebook Connect

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Riverside and Brookfield.

MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad

Classified Ad